Legal Opinion
Reger v. Mulrooney
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 13, 1934PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMerrell, J.
The charges preferred against the petitioners were that the petitioner Knott, on April 18, 1929, had arrested Lucy Berini and Raymond Mendez at No. 200 West Nineteenth street, New York city, for an alleged violation of section 887 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, without having obtained sufficient evidence warranting the arrest of said persons; and that Patrolman Knott, in his report, mentioned one Charles Collins as the name of the person found in the premises at the time of the arrest of the Berini woman and Mendez, and that said patrolman knew that said name was not the true name of such…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. HaasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
- People v. TaitAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- People v. TaitNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- People ex rel. Tappin v. CropseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- People v. StiglinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
3Cited by6 opinions
- Evans v. MonaghanNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Merritt v. SwopeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
- Evans v. MonaghanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Evans v. MonaghanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- La Forge v. KennedyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.