Legal Opinion

Scribner v. Holmes

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 1861PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from the Marion Circuit Court.

1Per curiam

This case was tried on May 16, on which day a motion for a new trial was overruled, exception taken, and leave given to file a bill of exceptions in thirty days. The bill was not filed until July 6. That was too late. A legal public highway, in actual use, is not embraced in a general covenant against incumbrances. It would be unreasonable that it should be. See Rawle on Cov. 141, et seq.

J. W. Gordon and Jno. A. Beal, for the appellant. D. McDonald, for the appellee.

The judgment is affirmed, with 5 per cent, damages and costs.

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kutz v. McCuneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Schurger v. MoormanIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Lohmiller v. Indian Ford Water-Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Sisk v. CaswellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  5. Caldwell v. Bank of SalemIndiana Supreme Court · 1863

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API