Legal Opinion
Doe v. Department of Mental Health, Mental Retardation, & Substance Abuse Services
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided August 29, 1997PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWathen, C.J.
[¶ 1] Plaintiffs Jane Doe and John Doe, unnamed state employees, and the Maine State Employees’ Association, appeal from the judgment entered against them in the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Alexander, J.) and in favor of defendants, the Department of Mental Health, Mental Retardation, and Substance Abuse Services and the Department of Administrative and Financial Services (“Departments”). Plaintiffs argue on appeal that the court erred in requiring public disclosure of the contents of a written arbitration decision invalidating disciplinary action. Finding no error, we affirm the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Moffett v. City of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Guy Gannett Publishing Co. v. University of MaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
- Thibeault v. LarsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
- Town of Madison, Department of Electric Works v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Bangor Publishing Co. v. City of BangorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
3Cited by5 opinions
- Springfield Terminal Railway Co. v. Department of TransportationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Cyr v. Madawaska School DepartmentSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
- Cyr v. Madawaska School DepartmentSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
- Doe v. Department of Mental Health, Mental Retardation, & Substance Abuse ServicesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
- SPRINGFIELD TERM. RY. v. Dept. of Transp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000