Legal Opinion

Graham v. Brix Maritime Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 21, 1999No. 9508-05510; CA A95063PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, C. J.

Plaintiff was injured while working as a deckhand on the tugboat Lewiston, which is owned and operated by defendant Brix Maritime Co. He brought this action under the Jones Act, 46 USC § 688, stating claims based on negligence and unseaworthiness. Defendant interposed an affirmative defense of contributory negligence. In response to a special verdict form, the jury found for defendant on the allegations of both of plaintiffs claims and, therefore, did not reach the affirmative defense in connection with either. Plaintiff appeals and makes four assignments of error. We find that only his first…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thomas Fashauer, Jr. v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  2. Rich v. Tite-Knot Pine MillOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Hansen v. Abrasive Engineering & Manufacturing, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Steele v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. Hansen v. Abrasive Engineering & Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Shoup v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API