Legal Opinion
Triplett Grille, Inc. v. City of Akron
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided March 17, 1993No. 5:92CV2488PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SAM H. BELL, District Judge.
Currently pending before the court is plaintiffs motion for a permanent injunction. The motion was filed on November 28, 1992. A hearing was held for purposes of deciding whether a temporary restraining order was justified. The court ruled on December 1, 1992, that a temporary injunction was not warranted. Subsequently, the court received argument and evidence from the parties at two other hearings.
BACKGROUND
The cause presented for this court’s resolution is one which examines the tension which frequently exists between expressions of moral standards…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Triplett Grille, Inc., D/B/A the Back Door v. City of AkronCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Cafe 207, Inc. v. St. Johns CountyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1994
- Pap's A.M. v. City of Erie, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Erie County1995