Legal Opinion

State v. Hatco Chemical Co.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided July 20, 1967PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

96 N.J. Super. 238 (1967)

232 A.2d 838

STATE OF NEW JERSEY (DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH OF THE TOWNSHIP OF WOODBRIDGE), PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

HATCO CHEMICAL COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued June 5, 1967.

Decided July 20, 1967.

Before Judges GAULKIN, LEWIS and LABRECQUE.

Mr. Edmund Vitale, Jr., argued the cause for Township of Woodbridge (Mr. Norman Robbins, attorney).

Mr. Ernest Gross argued the cause for Hatco Chemical Company (Messrs. Gross, Weissberger & Linett, attorneys; Mr. David Linett on the brief).

Mr. Richard Newman, Deputy Attorney General,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. Laurel Mills Sewerage Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  2. Studerus Oil Co. v. City of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1942
  3. Verona v. ShalitNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  4. Verona v. ShalitNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. McCormack Terminal, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API