Legal Opinion

Guy v. Terex Corp. (In Re Terex Corp.)

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided November 9, 1988No. 19-40217PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDING AS TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND UNITED STATES’ CROSS-MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

HAROLD F. WHITE, Bankruptcy Judge.

This matter comes before the court upon Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed August 26, 1988 pursuant to the court’s Order of July 14, 1988 granting time to file pleadings pursuant to summary judgment. On September 12, 1988 Defendant United States filed its Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and Response to Plaintiff’s Motion and also a Memorandum of Law in Support. Defendant Terex Corporation filed its Memorandum in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Otte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. In The Matter Of Southwest Restaurant Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  3. Armadillo Corporation v. EnnisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
  4. In Re The Laub Baking CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  5. In Re Armadillo Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1976

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Miller v. Blatstein (In Re Main, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Consolidated Flooring Services v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API