Legal Opinion

Cummings v. Hill

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 11, 1987No. 86-924PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from a judgment following an action for breach of contract. After an ore tenus hearing, the trial court held for the plaintiffs. We affirm.

This matter arose as follows: In May 1985, the plaintiffs, Spurlin W. Hill and Frances A. Hill began negotiations with the defendant, Guilford Dudley Cummings, Jr., for the sale of the Hills' 50-acre farm in Chilton County. After numerous discussions, the parties reached an oral agreement for the sale of the property. The terms of that oral agreement were as follows: a total purchase price of $70,500, to be paid in three installments, to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Haddox v. First Alabama Bank of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  2. Sieben v. TorreySupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  3. Rhoden v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  4. Thompson v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  5. Medical Clinic Board of Birmingham-Crestwood v. SmelleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Marriott Intern., Inc. v. deCELLESupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  2. Spruiell v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  3. Rime-Shatten Dev. Co. v. Birmingham Cable Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  4. Poole v. HENDERSON, BLACK AND GREENESupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  5. State v. TerryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API