United States v. William Paul See Walker
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.
William See Walker was convicted of one count of aggravated sexual abuse. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 2241(c), 1153. He asserts on appeal that he was unfairly prejudiced by the refusal of the district court 1 to permit a defense expert to examine the child whom he was accused of assaulting. He also contends that the district court erred in determining that he was a career offender under the United States Sentencing Guidelines. See U.S.S.G. 4B1.1. We affirm the judgment of the district court in all respects.
Mr. See Walker was charged with aggravated sexual abuse after L.L., a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lisenba v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Leocal v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. Edward E. Bordeaux, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. James T. WhittedCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Timothy Jerome McCallCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. DavisDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2008
- United States v. B.J.S.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2025
- United States v. Dion ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. McGheeDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2007