Legal Opinion

Branch v. Mays

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided May 25, 2017No. Case No. 3:16-cv-249PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HARRY S. MATTICE, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is Defendant’s Amended Motion to Dismiss. (Doc. 25). For the reasons stated herein, Plaintiffs Complaint will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under the forum non conveniens doctrine. Accordingly, Defendant’s Amended Motion to Dismiss will be DENIED AS MOOT.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff filed the instant Complaint for legal malpractice and breach of contract on May 17, 2016. (Doc. 1). On June 30, 2016, Defendant filed its original Motion to Dismiss, arguing that Plaintiffs Complaint should be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Walden v. FioreSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  5. Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bush v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2021
  2. Courtelis v. RosenbergDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2022
  3. Courtelis v. RosenbergDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2022
  4. Emergency Recovery, Inc. v. Conifer Revenue Cycle Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2025
  5. LC Investments, LLC v. FordDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API