Legal Opinion

Braniff Inv. Co. v. Robertson

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided March 27, 1935No. Nos. 1565-1857-5838PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAXLOR, Commissioner.

Defendant in error, F. M. Robertson brought this suit to cancel the interest on the loan involved herein on the ground of usury. Plaintiffs in error, by cross-action, declared the entire debt due, and prayed for foreclosure. Judgment on trial before the court without a jury was for defendant in error. The Court of Civil Appeals affirmed the judgment. 74 S.W.(2d) 425, 426. The borrower, Robertson, made application through the Braniff Investment Company for a loan of $3,500 for ten years to be repaid in such manner as the lender might direct. No rate of interest is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Shropshire v. Commerce Farm Credit Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Shropshire v. Commerce Farm Credit Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Dugan v. LewisTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. San Antonio Real Estate Building & Loan Ass'n v. StewartTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  5. McKelvain v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 1883

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Fort Worth Independent School District v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Jones v. KelleyTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Cadle Co. v. Butler, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997
  4. Federal Mortg. Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  5. Community Savings and Loan Association v. FisherTexas Supreme Court · 1966

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API