Legal Opinion

Temple v. Osburn

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1910PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From Lake: Lawrence T. Harris, Judge. This is a suit brought by Minnie B. Temple against F. W. Osburn, Trustee; S. W. Brown, The Eugene Loan & Savings Bank, J. J.'Walton and Emma Walton, his wife, S. P. Ness and Mary S. Ness, his wife, E. 0. Potter and Emily B. Potter, his wife, and A. C. Woodcock, for the purpose of quieting title to cértain lands in Lane County, Oregon. From a decree in favor of defendants, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice King

This is a suit to remove a cloud from the title to lots 4, 5, 12, and 13, section 12, township 16 S. range 8 W., W. M., containing 163 acres, in Lane County, Oregon, and comes here on appeal from a decree in defendant’s favor.

The facts, as we gather them from the record, are these: Texana Brown, while the wife of S. W. Brown, filed and made final proof upon the lands above described, under what is known as the timber and stone act. Some controversy appears, concerning where the funds, paid the government for the land, were procured, but, under the views hereinafter expressed, this feature…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dickerson v. TillinghastNew York Court of Chancery · 1833
  2. Ard v. BrandonSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Bohall v. DillaSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Wells v. MorrowSupreme Court of Alabama · 1861
  5. Walker v. GoldsmithOregon Supreme Court · 1886

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Barnes v. SpencerOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Partlow v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Partlow v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. Partlow v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API