Legal Opinion

Hoida, Inc. v. M&I MIDSTATE BANK

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided September 16, 2004No. 03-2108PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDykman, J.

¶ 1. Hoida, Inc., appeals from a summary judgment granted to McDonald Title Co., Inc., and M&I Midstate Bank. Hoida, a construction subcontractor on a Plover, Wisconsin, building project, incurred losses when the prime contractor, Packard Construction, Inc., failed to pay Hoida for materials it supplied to Packard. Hoida seeks to hold M&I, the construction lender on the project, and McDonald Title, M&I's disbursing agent, liable for these losses. It contends M&I and McDonald Title breached a duty of care owed to Hoida by failing to obtain lien waivers 1 and by continuing to fund draw requests…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Tietsworth v. Harley-Davidson, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  3. A. E. Investment Corp. v. Link Builders, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Rockweit v. SenecalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Sawyer v. MidelfortWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hoida, Inc. v. M & I MIDSTATE BANKWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Great Lakes Excavating, Inc. v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Hoida, Inc. v. M & I MIDSTATE BANKWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Hoida, Inc. v. M & I MIDSTATE BANKWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API