Legal Opinion

Hines v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 3, 1920PublishedCited by 8 opinions

A Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Madison County; M. F, Horne, Judge. Judgment affirmed if remittitur entered.

1Opinion of the Court

Wills, Circuit Judge.

This writ of error was taken to a judgment for damages for live stock killed on a railroad. The verdict found the value of one animal to be $75.00, and of two others to be $45.00 each. The judgment awards double damages for the first and actual damages for the other two animals, and allowed $47.50 as attorney-fees. The statute in one class of cases allows the recovery of double damages and all costs, “which costs shall include a reasonable attorney’s fee, said fee to be determined by the court.” Sec. 1, Chap. 5214, Acts of 1903, S'ec. 2875, Compiled Laws, 1914. -

This…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. AultSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. State ex rel. Royal Insurance v. BarrsSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
  3. Hines v. GravinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
  4. Director General of Railroads v. WilfordSupreme Court of Florida · 1921
  5. Howard v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API