Legal Opinion

Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. McClendon

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1933No. Motion No. 11,046PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

— Relator’s motion for permission to file petition for the issuance of a writ of mandamus is refused for the reasons hereinafter stated. The Railroad Commission of Texas entered an order refusing to issue to respondent Blankenship a permit to drill an oil and gas well on a tract containing approximately one-half of an acre of land in Gregg County. In a suit filed by Blankenship in the District Court of Travis County in the nature of an appeal from said order, and in which relator intervened on account of its ownership of an oil and gas lease on adjoining land, judgment was rendered annulling…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Houtchens v. MercerTexas Supreme Court · 1930
  2. W.D. Yett, Mayor v. CookTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Yett v. CookTexas Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Yett v. CookTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Allen v. KitchenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hastings Oil Co. v. Texas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Continental Oil Company v. LesherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  3. Winslow v. Duval County Ranch CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  4. Crawford Energy, Inc. v. Texas Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  5. Allen v. Gulf Oil Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1940

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API