Frey v. Kent City Nursing Home, Inc.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.
Two basic questions of law are presented by the assignments of error on this appeal and cross-appeal.
First, are plaintiffs entitled to maintain an action .and recover for the value of architectural services rendered to defendants? Second, if so, are plaintiffs entitled to enforce by foreclosure a recorded lien against defendants’ real property?
The trial court answered the first question in the affirmative, the second in the negative.
Plaintiff Strickland was a professional engineer licensed by the state. Plaintiff Frey, although he had been an architect in Holland and was employed by an…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- DeHeer v. Seattle Post-IntelligencerWashington Supreme Court · 1962
- Sherwood v. WiseWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Wright v. City of KennewickWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- City of Seattle v. LoveWashington Supreme Court · 1962
- Wickre v. AllenWashington Supreme Court · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Smith v. RodeneWashington Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. RutherfordWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- Harvey v. ClemanWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- Jones v. National Bank of Commerce of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- Glazer v. AdamsWashington Supreme Court · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.