Legal Opinion

Pilkington v. Riley

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 26, 1981No. 80-143PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George Rose Smith, Justice.

Pilkington brought this action to recover for personal injuries and property damage sustained when his pickup truck ran into a heavy roller being used by the defendant Riley, a road contractor, in resurfacing part of Highway 81 north of Monticello. The jury, in response to interrogatories, apportioned the total negligence as 100% in Pilkington and none in Riley, none in Riley’s employee, Ethel Winston, and none in Curtis Vincent, a third-party defendant brought in by Riley. The appeal comes within our jurisdiction as a tort action. Rule 29 (1) (o). We find no merit…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Walton v. TullSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
  2. Thudium v. DicksonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jim Halsey Co., Inc. v. BonarSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  2. Eisner v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999
  3. Taylor v. RiddellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  4. Jim Halsey Co., Inc. v. BonarSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  5. Vant v. LongCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API