Pilkington v. Riley
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
George Rose Smith, Justice.
Pilkington brought this action to recover for personal injuries and property damage sustained when his pickup truck ran into a heavy roller being used by the defendant Riley, a road contractor, in resurfacing part of Highway 81 north of Monticello. The jury, in response to interrogatories, apportioned the total negligence as 100% in Pilkington and none in Riley, none in Riley’s employee, Ethel Winston, and none in Curtis Vincent, a third-party defendant brought in by Riley. The appeal comes within our jurisdiction as a tort action. Rule 29 (1) (o). We find no merit…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Walton v. TullSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
- Thudium v. DicksonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jim Halsey Co., Inc. v. BonarSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
- Eisner v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999
- Taylor v. RiddellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Jim Halsey Co., Inc. v. BonarSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
- Vant v. LongCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000