Legal Opinion

McCaskill v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 21, 1995No. 9415SC447PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff contends that the trial court erred by entering summary judgment in favor of defendant and denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. Because the accident occurred in 1990, the disposition of this case is governed by the pre-1991 version of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 20-279.21(b)(4), which stated:

In any event, the limit of underinsured motorist coverage applicable to any claim is determined to be the difference between the amount paid to the claimant pursuant to the exhausted liability policy and the total limits of the owner’s underinsured motorist coverages…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sutton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  3. Wiggins v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  4. Watson v. American National Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  5. Watson v. American National Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. National Union Fire Insurance v. NjugunaDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2014
  2. David Vincent v. Amco Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
  3. Selective Insurance Company of South Carolina v. Adam DuffyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2025
  4. Selective Insurance Company of South Carolina v. Lawn Etc., LLCDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API