Legal Opinion

Arriaga v. Department of Labor & Industries

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 30, 2014No. 32287-4-IIIPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLawrence-Berrey, J.

¶[1 When a final industrial insurance order, decision, or award is based on a medical determination, a physician is deemed an interested party. In such a case, the Department of Labor and Industries (Department) must provide notice of the order, decision, or award to both the physician and the claimant. Failure to provide notice tolls the 60-day appeal period. At issue here *819is whether a segregation order was communicated to a claimant’s physician when the physician did not see the order because of a breakdown in mail handling procedures in his office. We hold that the order was communicated…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Marley v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Harris v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Rogers v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  4. Rogers v. Dept. of Labor & Indus.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. Kingery v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1997

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. B&R Sales, Inc. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  2. B & R Sales, Inc. v. Dept. Of L & ICourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  3. Ralph K. Simmons, V. Dept Of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2023
  4. Renton School District 403 v. Daniel D. DolphCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  5. Ride the Ducks Seattle LLC v. Ride the Ducks International LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API