Arriaga v. Department of Labor & Industries
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtLawrence-Berrey, J.
¶[1 When a final industrial insurance order, decision, or award is based on a medical determination, a physician is deemed an interested party. In such a case, the Department of Labor and Industries (Department) must provide notice of the order, decision, or award to both the physician and the claimant. Failure to provide notice tolls the 60-day appeal period. At issue here *819is whether a segregation order was communicated to a claimant’s physician when the physician did not see the order because of a breakdown in mail handling procedures in his office. We hold that the order was communicated…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Marley v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Harris v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Rogers v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Rogers v. Dept. of Labor & Indus.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Kingery v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- B&R Sales, Inc. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- B & R Sales, Inc. v. Dept. Of L & ICourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Ralph K. Simmons, V. Dept Of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2023
- Renton School District 403 v. Daniel D. DolphCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- Ride the Ducks Seattle LLC v. Ride the Ducks International LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.