Legal Opinion

Sarchett v. Superior Court

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 28, 1991No. 1 CA-SA 91-098PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GERBER, Judge.

This special action arises from the trial court’s rejection of petitioners’ (“Sarchetts”) request for change of judge pursuant to Rule 42(f)(1), Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure.

We accept jurisdiction to clarify the meaning of the waiver provision of Rule 42(f)l(D)(i), Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure. The interpretation of this newly amended rule presents an issue of statewide importance impacting all trial courts.

FACTS

The City of Phoenix filed a complaint in eminent domain against the Sarchetts seeking immediate possession of their real property. The city applied for an…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Drozda v. McComasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  2. Lewis v. KelliherCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  3. Juvenile in Mohave County Juvenile Court v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  4. Juvenile in Mohave County Juvenile Court v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  5. Juvenile in Mohave County Juvenile Court v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API