Legal Opinion

Merkouras v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1917No. 19611PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Lancaster county: Willard E. Stewart, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtCornish, J.

Action for damages for loss of part of foot, caused by defendant’s negligence. Plaintiff recovered, and defendant appeals.

At the time of the accident plaintiff, with others, was engaged as an employee of defendant in its yards at Lincoln in putting ice in refrigerator cars. A switch-track of defendant ran along an elevated platform connected with an ice-house, so that ice could be put from it into the top of the car. A ladder led from the ground *719to the platform. Two empty cars, designated as “rubbish cars,” were on the track in front of the ice-house, waiting to be moved onto a place farther…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. WymoreNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. McIntireSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Jones v. Virginian Railway Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Belcher's AdministratrixSupreme Court of Virginia · 1907
  5. Hoffman v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jessup v. DavisNebraska Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Penhansky v. Drake Realty Construction Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Mason v. ReynoldsNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Tsiampras v. Union Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Merkouras v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API