Legal Opinion

Krumpelmann v. Ulsaker Printing Co.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChristianson, J.

The defendant corporation is engaged in the printing business. One, I. H. Ulsaker, was the manager and president of the corporation and the principal stockholder therein. On or about January 5th, 1921, certain arrangements were made between said I. II. Ilsaker and the plaintiff and one E. II. Dummer, whereby the said plaintiff and said Dummer agreed to enter into the employ of said Ulsaker Printing Company and work for it during the year 1921. The original arrangement was verbal. Eater the following written instrument was executed:

A. A. ICrumpehnann,

Fargo, N. Dak.

Dear Sir:

This is to confirm…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Martin v. WebbSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Ceeder v. H. M. Loud & Sons Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Kraniger v. People's Building SocietySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  4. Calvert v. Idaho Stage Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Tourtelot v. WhithedNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McAndrews v. Idawa Gold Mining Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Fischer v. Streeter Milling Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API