State v. Neese
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Bernes, Judge.
Jerry Lee Neese was charged with possession of methamphetamine. The state appeals an order granting Neese’s motion to suppress evidence obtained during what the state contends was a valid search pursuant to consent. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
In reviewing a trial court’s ruling on a motion to suppress, we construe the evidence and all inferences to be drawn from the evidence in the light most favorable to the trial court’s decision. See State v. Goode, 298 Ga. App. 749, 750 (681 SE2d 199) (2009). To the extent that the evidence is uncontroverted and no question…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. JourdanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- State v. DiazCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Springsteen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. ShytleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- Rainey v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
- State v. LamondaSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
- Rainey v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
- State v. LamondaSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.