State ex rel. Atkinson v. Ross
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Thurs-ton county, Rice, J., entered November 13, 1906, upon findings in favor of the defendants, after a trial on the merits, dismissing an action to enjoin the board of state land commissioners from investing state funds in certain municipal bonds.
1Opinion of the CourtDunbar, J.
This action was brought in the superior court of Thurston county, by the state of Washington on relation of its attorney general, against the board of state land commissioners, to enjoin the board from investing moneys of the permanent school fund of the state in an igsue of general city bonds of the city of Seattle in the amount of $600,000, which bonds were authorized by an ordinance of the city council of Seattle, after the submission to the qualified voters of said city of the question of the issuance of such bonds, and upon a favorable vote thereon. The petition alleged that, on January…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re Difference & Controversy between E. M. Derby & Co. & City of ModestoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Parkinson v. Seattle School District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1902
3Cited by3 opinions
- Tennent v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- City of Redondo Beach v. BarkleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Lusk v. Boise CityIdaho Supreme Court · 1930