Legal Opinion

Morris v. Wells Fargo & Company

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 19, 2024No. 4:23-cv-03277Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ANTHONY MORRIS, Case No. 23-cv-03277-HSG 8 Plaintiff, AMENDED ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 9 v. MOTION TO DISMISS 10 WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 62 11 Defendants. 12 13 Before the Court is Wells Fargo & Company and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.’s motion to 14 dismiss Plaintiff’s first amended class action complaint, Dkt. No. 62. The Court finds the matter 15 appropriate for disposition without oral argument and deems it submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). 16 The Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Karim Khoja v. Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API