Legal Opinion

Casey Ex Rel. Kirton v. Fredrickson Motor Express Corp.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 16, 1990No. 8828SC1274PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COZORT, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals from a jury verdict finding that plaintiff was not injured by the negligence of defendant. He contends that he was prejudiced by the trial court’s refusal to instruct the jury on the “thin-skulled plaintiff” doctrine. We agree and remand for a new trial.

On 3 November 1981, plaintiff, a twenty-four-year-old student at UNC-Asheville, was driving his automobile on U.S. 25A (also called Sweeten Creek Road) in Asheville. Plaintiff was traveling south out of Asheville on his way to his part-time job at United Parcel Service, where his shift was to begin at 3:30 a.m.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Exum v. BoylesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Lockwood v. McCaskillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Vernon v. CristSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. White v. GreerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. James E. Niehus and Denise Niehus, Cross-Appellants v. Vince Liberio and Frank Vittorio, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  2. Outlaw v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  3. Primm v. U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  4. Hughes v. WebsterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  5. Taylor v. EllerbyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API