Legal Opinion

United States v. Rabanal

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 19, 2007No. 06-10307, 06-11281PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REAVLEY, Circuit Judge:

Marco Antonio Rabanal and Francisco Villegas-Jaimes appeal from their sentences in unrelated cases after pleading guilty to illegal reentry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Both defendants received sentence enhancements pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2 because of prior convictions for alien smuggling offenses. Because of a commonality in the defendants’ arguments, we sua sponte consolidate the two appeals. 1 Finding no error, we affirm both sentences.

Rabanal pleaded guilty to illegal reentry after removal, in violation of sections 1326(a) and (b)(2). His presentence report…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Richard Young AlfaroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. CarbajalCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  3. United States v. Solis-CampozanoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. United States v. BonillaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. Shawn SerfassCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  3. United States v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  5. Little v. Shell Exploration & Production Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API