Legal Opinion · Dissent

Doehring v. Wagner

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 30, 1989No. 395, September Term, 1987Published

1DissentAlpert, Judge

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion that, as a matter of law, appellee’s actions of erecting a chain across their right-of-way at night without any warning signs or reflectors does not constitute willful or wanton misconduct.

As the majority notes, the function of a summary judgment procedure is not to try the case or decide the issues of fact raised, rather it is merely to determine whether there are issues of fact to be tried and if there are none, to render judgment. Brewer v. Mele, 267 Md. 437, 298 A.2d 156 (1972); DeGroft v. Lancaster Silo Co., 72 Md.App. 154, 527 A.2d…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. King v. BankerdCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. Brewer v. MeleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  3. Bramble v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  4. Thomas v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Yeske v. Avon Old Farms School, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API