James Toler v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Steadman, Senior Judge:
Appealing his convictions for several firearm offenses, appellant James Toler argues that (1) all his convictions must be reversed because he was required to reveal his social security number without a prior Miranda 1 warning, and (2) his convictions for possession of unregistered firearms must be reversed because the government failed to prove as an element of the offense that the firearms were not "antique" firearms. We disagree and therefore affirm the judgment.
I. Factual Background
On August 18, 2016, around 5:30 p.m., members of the Gun Recovery Unit (GRU) of the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Pennsylvania v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. Thomas RoyalCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Harold F. Mayo, Jr. And Mark A. McGarghanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Vincent Joseph COMPOS v. The PEOPLE of the State of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2021
- Kinney v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2022
- Redmond, Jr. v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025