Legal Opinion

United States v. Harold F. Mayo, Jr. And Mark A. McGarghan

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 8, 1983No. 631, 632, Dockets 82-1256, 82-1258PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MESKILL, Circuit Judge:

Harold F. Mayo, Jr. and Mark A. McGarghan, two of six defendants below, appeal their convictions for assorted violations of the federal firearms laws. After a five week jury trial before Judge Coffrin of the United States District Court for the District of Vermont, Mayo was found guilty on four counts of receipt of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(h) (1976) (counts 3 through 6); two counts of unlawful transfer of a machine gun in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5861(e) (1976) (counts 11 and 13); one count of unlawful possession of a machine gun…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Mathews v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. United States v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. BrandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  4. United States v. Thurnell Alston, Ervin BrennonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  5. United States of America, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Terry Louis GannCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API