Legal Opinion

Dorothy POTTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF CLEVELAND, Defendant-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 18, 1975No. 75-1146PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal from the dismissal of a complaint alleging violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., requires us to determine whether the district court correctly applied to the evidence adduced at trial the shifting burdens of proof articulated by the Supreme Court in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 93 S.Ct. 1817, 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973). Specifically we are asked to determine whether a Title VII plaintiff, in order to establish a prima facie case must establish that the wrong allegedly committed was based…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Wheelock College v. Massachusetts Commission Against DiscriminationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  2. Robert FLOWERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CROUCH-WALKER CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  3. Newport Shipyard, Inc. v. Rhode Island Commission for Human RightsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1984
  4. Nolvert P. SCOTT, Jr., Appellant, Etc. v. the UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE Et Al.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  5. Mrintunjoy Sengupta v. Morrison-Knudsen Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API