Converse v. Byars
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman
This is a proceeding to obtain a declaratory judgment construing the will of Charles H. Martien, deceased, made in 1927, devising and bequeathing both real and personal property. Paragraph third of the will provided that in the event the wife of the testator, Anna B. Martien, survived him, all property (except cash in the sum of $500 and jewelry, clothing, furniture and personal mementoes) should be held in trust for her care, support and treatment. Five hundred dollars cash was bequeathed in trust, the income from which was to be used for the care and upkeep of the graves of testator’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Estate of ToddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Estate of HittellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Schneller v. SchnellerIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
- Galloupe v. BlakeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Arnold v. MorrisseyMontana Supreme Court · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Polen v. BakerOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- In re the Estate of RobinsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1963
- Polen v. BakerOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Kehler Estate, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northumberland County1978
- Trudgen v. TrudgenMontana Supreme Court · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.