Legal Opinion

Forbes v. Officer John Doe

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided January 29, 2024No. 6:18-cv-06700Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ROBERT FORBES, Plaintiff, DECISION AND ORDER 6:18-CV-06700 EAW JOHN DOE, SGT. ANTHONY BONGIOVANNI, CITY OF ROCHESTER, OFFICER MICHAEL DIMAURO, and OFFICER CHRISTINA MOORHOUSE, Defendants. INTRODUCTION Pro se plaintiff Robert Forbes (“Plaintiff”) brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, asserting claims against Defendants Sergeant Bongiovanni (“Bongiovann1’), Officer Michael DiMauro (“DiMauro”), Officer Christina Moorhouse (“Moorhouse”), Officer John Doe, and the City of Rochester. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API