Legal Opinion

Autoliv ASP, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided December 6, 2019No. Consol. 18-00037Published

1Opinion of the Court

Slip. Op. 19-154 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE AUTOLIV ASP, INC., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Before: Leo M. Gordon, Judge Defendant, Consol. Court No. 18-00037 and ARCELORMITTAL TUBULAR PRODUCTS, MICHIGAN SEAMLESS TUBE, LLC, PTC ALLIANCE CORP., WEBCO INDUSTRIES, INC., ZEKELMAN INDUSTRIES, INC., and PLYMOUTH TUBE CO., USA, Defendant-Intervenors. OPINION [Sustaining final affirmative material injury determinations.] Decided: December 6, 2019 Kenneth G. Weigel and Chunlian Yang, Alston & Bird LLP, of Washington, DC, for Plaintiff Autoliv Asp, Inc. Brian R. Soiset, Attorney, Office…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Nippon Steel Corporation, Nkk Corporation, Kawasaki Steel Corporation, and Toyo Kohan Co., Ltd. v. United States, and Mittal Steel USA Isg Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. Eurodif S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API