Legal Opinion
Consolidated Cut Stone Co. v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided March 20, 1930No. 739Published
1Opinion of the Court
KENNAMER, District Judge.
This suit was brought under section 16, paragraph 2 of the Interstate Commerce Act (36 Stat. 554, as amended, 41 Stat. 491, § 424, 49 USCA § 16 [2]), to enforce a reparation award made in favor of -the plaintiff by the Interstate Commerce Commission. The Commission, pursuant to complaint filed before it by the plaintiff attacking the rates on rough Indiana limestone from Bedford, Ind., and points taking the same rate to Tulsa, Okl., held hearings and made the reparation award involved in this action. 113 I. C. C. 480.
The Commission made findings that the rate assailed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Darnell-Taenzer Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Sloss-sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Olds v. Mapes-Reeve Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
- Dow Chemical Co. v. Detroit Chemical WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Columbia Mills, Inc. v. Machenbach Importing Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1921