Legal Opinion

Swank v. Great Northern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 19, 1895No. Nos. 9610-(193)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the municipal court of St. Paul, in favor of plaintiff, entered in pursuance of the findings and order of Orr, J.

1Opinion of the CourtCanty, J.

In the summer of 1892 defendant was engaged in the construction of. what is known as the “Red Lake Falls Branch” of its railroad. One Fogleberg had a contract to grade a certain portion of the roadbed, but had defaulted in performance. Plaintiff had just finished a similar contract of another part of the roadbed, and had on hand the tools and appliances for that kind of work. Thereupon an agreement was made between him and defendant under which he proceeded to do the work contracted for as aforesaid by Fogleberg. Plaintiff brought this action to recover a balance . claimed to be due him under…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Midland Loan Finance Co. v. LorentzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  2. Blindman v. Industrial Loan & Thrift Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  3. Wolpert v. FosterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Staughton v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API