Legal Opinion

Eli Lilly and Company v. Casey

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 19, 1970No. 4350PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRISSOM, Chief Justice.

Roy Casey sued Eli Lilly and Company in Haskell County for damages. He alleged he purchased Treflan which had been manufactured and placed in commerce by defendant; that Treflan was advertised as a product which, when applied to cotton land, prevented weeds, grass, and the like, from getting into cotton; that it did not prevent such growth in his cotton but stunted his cotton; that defendant breached its implied warranty of fitness or merchantability and plaintiff was damaged as a result of using Treflan in accordance with defendant’s instructions. The defendant, a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. McEwen v. HarrisonTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Ammex Warehouse Company v. ArcherTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Republic National Bank of Dallas v. FredericksTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Lloyds Casualty Insurer v. McCraryTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n v. ElderTexas Supreme Court · 1955

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. El Paso Moulding & Manufacturing Co. v. Southwest Forest Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. DentonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  3. Coiffure Continental, Inc. v. AllertCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  4. Shafer v. WillisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  5. Eli Lilly & Co. v. FlyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API