Fedex Ground Package System, Inc. v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION BY
Judge PELLEGRINI.
The plain language of the Pennsylvania Tax Code (Code)1 provides that the proportion of a truck company’s income and value for corporate taxes should be determined by the company’s activity in Pennsylvania. Activity under the Code is plainly based on comparing “revenue miles” in Pennsylvania with “revenue miles” outside of Pennsylvania. Because the majority’s apportionment calculation eliminates “revenue miles” as the basis of apportionment to one based on “gross receipts,” I respectively dissent.
FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. (Taxpayer) is a truck…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Exxon Corp. v. Department of Revenue of Wis.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- First Union National Bank v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Allebach v. DEPT. OF FINANCE AND REVENUESupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006