Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fedex Ground Package System, Inc. v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 27, 2007Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION BY

Judge PELLEGRINI.

The plain language of the Pennsylvania Tax Code (Code)1 provides that the proportion of a truck company’s income and value for corporate taxes should be determined by the company’s activity in Pennsylvania. Activity under the Code is plainly based on comparing “revenue miles” in Pennsylvania with “revenue miles” outside of Pennsylvania. Because the majority’s apportionment calculation eliminates “revenue miles” as the basis of apportionment to one based on “gross receipts,” I respectively dissent.

FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. (Taxpayer) is a truck…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Exxon Corp. v. Department of Revenue of Wis.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. First Union National Bank v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Allebach v. DEPT. OF FINANCE AND REVENUESupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API