Legal Opinion
United States v. John Garren
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 8, 1990No. 87-3031PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TANG, Circuit Judge:
John Garren appeals his conviction for rafting on a federally regulated river without a permit in violation of 43 C.F.R. 8351.-2-l(e). We affirm his conviction but remand for resentencing.
FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
Under the authority of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, 16 U.S.C. §§ 1271-1287, the Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) and the United States Forest Service (“USFS”) jointly regulate rafting access to designated portions of the Rouge River in Oregon through a permit system. The BLM has the lead responsibility for administering the commercial system (for profit rafting…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Schweiker v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Roberts v. SpaldingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Joseph Samuel Kinsey, United States of America v. Albert KinseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. William Richard MinorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Marc L. PollandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Daniel Francis Marzano v. Lawrence KincheloeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Collins v. Schweitzer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Collins v. Schweitzer, Inc.District Court, D. Idaho · 1991
- Collins v. Schweitzer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.