Legal Opinion

Van Ruymbeke v. Patapsco Industrial Park

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 13, 1971No. [No. 326, September Term, 1970.]PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Since this case involves a suit in ejectment and a patent for submerged lands, it is a relatively “rare bird” in present day judicial proceedings. It also involves claims relative to accretion and an argument as to what is proper evidence to establish mesne profits, with the added spice of a contention that the case is now moot because of a settlement between certain of the parties subsequent to judgment. Appellants, Eugene Douglas Dudley Kenneth Van Ruymbeke et al. (the Van Ruymbekes), were plaintiffs. They are unhappy with the result of the trial in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County,…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Yates v. MilwaukeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Railroad Co. v. SchurmeirSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. Day v. DayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1865
  4. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. ChaseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
  5. Inhabitants of East-Haven v. HemingwaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1828

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Harbor Island Marina v. BOARD OF CTY. COMMISSIONERS OF CALVERT CTY.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  2. Department of Natural Resources v. FranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  3. Board of Public Works v. Larmar Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  4. Hirsch v. Maryland Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  5. Department of Natural Resources v. Mayor of Ocean CityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API