Legal Opinion

Hollingsworth v. Robe Lumber Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1935No. 25439. Department OnePublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Main, J. —

This action was brought to recover wages for labor performed in a logging operation and to foreclose liens for such labor. In the complaint, there is an attempt to separately state four causes of action. In the answer, after denials to the material allegations of the complaint, there is an affirmative defense of a written contract executed by the plaintiffs and the defendant Robe Lumber Company.

The trial was to the court without a jury, and no formal findings or conclusions of law were made. There was a decree against the Robe Lumber Company in the sum of $352.20, and the lien…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Powell v. Construction Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Casement v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. State v. PsarasWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Glover v. Richardson & Elmer Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Johnston v. Seattle Taxicab & Transfer Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Witherspoon v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Ball v. Stokely Foods, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Fardig v. ReynoldsWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. McManemyWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Sills v. SorensonWashington Supreme Court · 1937

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API