Legal Opinion
Coyle v. P.T. Garuda Indonesia
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided June 27, 2001No. CIV.99-1348-JEPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROBERT E. JONES, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge John Jelderks filed Findings and Recommendation on April 30, 2001, in the above entitled case. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of a magistrate judge’s Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the magistrate judge’s report. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920, 102 S.Ct.…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. ShuteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gupta v. Austrian AirlinesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002
- Robertson v. American Airlines, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Burton v. Air France-KLMDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2020