Legal Opinion

State v. Penansky

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 10, 1976No. 52998PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Clark, Judge.

In this search and seizure case, the state appeals from the grant of defendant’s motion to suppress evidence. We reverse.

The search warrant bears the signature of the affiant and the jurat of the magistrate who issued the warrant. It reads, in part: "The probable cause on which the belief of the affiant is based is as follows: See attached affidavit.” The attached affidavit was signed by the affiant, but this jurat was not signed by the issuing magistrate.

At the hearing, the affiant testified that he was sworn before he signed the affidavit. Nevertheless, the court concluded that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Scroggins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
  2. State v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  3. Willoughby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  4. Goggins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Adams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  2. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  3. State v. SurowieckiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  4. State v. SurowieckiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API