Legal Opinion

Haist v. Wu

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 4, 1992No. 1-90-0716PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gordon

This action was brought under the Wrongful Death Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1981, ch. 70, pars. 1, 2), to recover damages for the death of Yen Yen Wang allegedly caused by the negligence of the defendant Dr. Wei Wu in his treatment of the decedent. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, but awarded zero damages. Both parties have appealed. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

Facts

In April of 1982, the decedent Yen Yen Wang came to the United States from her native Taiwan. About a month later, she was joined by her husband, Chung Gie Wang. Neither Yen…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Alvis v. RibarIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Kozak v. RETIREMENT BOARD OF FIREMEN'S ANNUITY AND BENEFIT FUNDIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Nudd v. MatsoukasIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Buzz Barton & Associates, Inc. v. GiannoneIllinois Supreme Court · 1985

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Seef v. Ingalls Memorial HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  2. Erickson v. KERR, MDPS, INC.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Gabriel Builders v. Westchester Condominium AssociationAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  4. Van Hattem v. K Mart Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  5. Calloway v. Bovis Lend Lease, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2013

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API