Legal Opinion

State v. Espinosa

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 1, 1953No. 41228PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOISE, Justice.

The accused, Felix Espinosa, was prosecuted under a bill of information which charged that he “did wilfully and unlawfully obtain a narcotic drug, to-wit 16 dilaudid tablets by forging a prescription in the name of M. W. Miller and presenting same to Auralia Descauments, Pharmacist, contrary to the form of the Statute of the State of Louisiana * * He was tried and convicted and sentenced to serve ten years in the State Penitentiary. From this conviction and sentence he has appealed.

*523Defendant bases his appeal on seven bills of exception.

Bill No. 1.

After the swearing of the jury…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. PoeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1948
  2. State v. BroadnaxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
  3. State v. MatassaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
  4. State v. BienvenuSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
  5. State v. PettifieldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. NicolosiSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
  2. State v. GarnerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1959
  3. State v. StraughanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  4. State v. DabbsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
  5. State v. RagsdaleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API