Legal Opinion

Danielson v. Huether

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided June 3, 2020No. 4:18-cv-04039Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION BRUCE DANIELSON, 4:18-CV-04039-RAL Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR vs. RECONSIDERATION AND GRANTING IN PART MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE MIKE HUETHER, ORDER Defendant. In December 2018, this Court entered an Opinion and Order Granting in Part Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. Doc. 22. In that 44-page Opinion and Order, this Court explained why pro se Plaintiff Bruce Danielson had a claim under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

for alleged First Amendment retaliation against former Sioux Falls Mayor Defendant Michael Huether and why Danielson had…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McIntosh v. AntoninoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  2. Bredice v. Doctors Hospital, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1970
  3. In Re Bieter CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. YieldingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  5. Torras Herreria Y Construcciones, S.A. v. M/v Timur Star, Now Called the M/v Moran, Her Engines, Tackle Etc., and Singapore Bulk Carriers, Pte., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API