Wanstrom v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Orlyn Wanstrom appealed from a district court judgment affirming a Workers Compensation Bureau decision dismissing Wanstrom’s claim. The Bureau held because Wanstrom filed his claim after July 1, 1997, he was subject to N.D.C.C. § 65-01-15 (1995), and thus prohibited from using the presumption under N.D.C.C. § 65-01-02(18)(d) (1995). We hold the Bureau erred as a matter of law by concluding the application date was dis-positive instead of the injury date, and remand for additional Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as to whether the presumption has been…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Thompson v. North Dakota Workers' Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Holmgren v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Geck v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Loberg v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Saari v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Robertson v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Douville v. Pembina County Water Resource DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. YinemanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Snyder v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Sjostrand v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.