Legal Opinion

Wanstrom v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 2000No. 990306PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Orlyn Wanstrom appealed from a district court judgment affirming a Workers Compensation Bureau decision dismissing Wanstrom’s claim. The Bureau held because Wanstrom filed his claim after July 1, 1997, he was subject to N.D.C.C. § 65-01-15 (1995), and thus prohibited from using the presumption under N.D.C.C. § 65-01-02(18)(d) (1995). We hold the Bureau erred as a matter of law by concluding the application date was dis-positive instead of the injury date, and remand for additional Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as to whether the presumption has been…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Thompson v. North Dakota Workers' Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Holmgren v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Geck v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Loberg v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Saari v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Robertson v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Douville v. Pembina County Water Resource DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. YinemanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Snyder v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Sjostrand v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API