Legal Opinion

United States v. Williams

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 2, 1970No. Crim. No. 23579PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MASTERSON, District Judge.

The defendant in this criminal prosecution has been indicted for failure to perform a duty imposed by the Selective Service Act, to wit, failure to report for and submit to induction into the Armed Forces in violation of 50 U.S.C. App. §§ 454, 462. Defendant waived a jury trial and moved for a judgment of acquittal at the close of all the evidence pursuant to Rule 29(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. After reviewing the whole record, we have decided to grant the motion for judgment of acquittal and make the following

I. FINDINGS OF FACT(1) The…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. United States v. John StaffordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  4. United States v. George Anderson Bowen, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
  5. Ex Parte Henry WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1899

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sharon Andrade v. Charles A. Lauer, Acting Administrator, Office of Juvenile JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  2. National Ass'n of Greeting Card Publishers v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  3. United States v. Joshua GrouppCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
  4. United States v. GrouppDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1971
  5. National Association of Greeting Card Publishers v. The United States Postal Service, United Parcel Service of America, Inc., Intervenors. National Association of Greeting Card Publishers v. United States Postal Service, United Parcel Service of America, Inc., Intervenors. Associated Third Class Mail Users and National Easter Seal Society for Crippled Children and Adults v. United States Postal Service, Postal Rate Commission, Intervenors. State of Maine v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API