Legal Opinion

American Lithographic Co. v. Commercial Casualty Insurance

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 9, 1911PublishedCited by 7 opinions

On appeal from District Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.

The suit is for the balance claimed to be due of the contract price for printing certain insurance policies for defendant and furnishing electrotypes of the same. There were thirteen different forms of policy of four pages each. The contract was in writing and drawn by plaintiff, apparently upon its own printed form, containing various provisions not relevant to the present inquiry, and terminating thus:

“Remarks.
“12,000 Regular Policies, to be printed on Berlin Pure Linen Bond No. 29, and 9,000 Sample Policies, on paper as per sample…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Camden v. VarneySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1899
  2. Empire Rubber Manufacturing Co. v. MorrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1906

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Elliott Leases Cars, Inc. v. QuigleySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
  2. United States v. Lennox Metal Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  3. Star-Chronicle Pub. Co. v. New York Evening Post, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
  4. Spande v. Western Life Indemnity Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Kronisch v. Howard Savings InstitutionNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API