State v. Hascall
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Hannibal Court of Common Pleas. — Hon. Charles T. Hays, Judge. (1) The court erred in granting the State leave to amend the information by interlineation. State v. Schrum, 255 Mo. 273; State v. Henschel, 250 Mo. 263. (2) It is conceded, by reason 'of the amendment, that the- information did not designate whether it was a person, partnership or corporation to whom the instrument was passed, uttered and published.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Hannibal Court of Common Pleas. — Hon. Charles T. Hays, Judge. (1) The court erred in granting the State leave to amend the information by interlineation. State v. Schrum, 255 Mo. 273; State v. Henschel, 250 Mo. 263. (2) It is conceded, by reason 'of the amendment, that the- information did not designate whether it was a person, partnership or corporation to whom the instrument was passed, uttered and published. State v. Patterson, 259 Mo. 101. It does not permit of dispute that Sec. 4656, R. S. 1909, under which Haseall is charged, creates two distinct classes of offenses. State…
1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.
Appellant was charged by information in the Hannibal Court of Common Pleas with having uttered and published as true a forged instrument with knowledge of the forgery as defined in Section 4656, Revised Statutes 1909, in order to obtain $805 of the. property of Mary E. Lynch, with intent then and there to defraud. Upon a' trial he was convicted and sentenced to two years’ imprisonment in the penitentiary.
For many years prior to the time the offense is alleged to have been committed, October 28, 1918, Mary E. Lynch, a widow, had lived in Ralls County in the immediate neighborhood of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. PierceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
- State v. WitherspoonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
- State v. O'KelleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. MaloneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
- State v. StringerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
- State v. RobertsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922
- State v. KanerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.